|
Post by maddog1981 on Feb 5, 2011 12:41:22 GMT -4
Well, let's not say a total jobber set. Let's say 6 or 7 jobbers and 3 or 4 women.
Let's say:
Barry Horowitz Rocky King Italian Stallion Rough & Ready Reno Riggins Jumping Bomb Angels Judy Martin
It doesn't have to be those people.
I would be all for a jobber set. You can never get enough jobbers in the game if you ask me.
|
|
|
Post by Dustin on Feb 5, 2011 12:43:39 GMT -4
I would totally jump on a jobber set.
|
|
|
Post by tyguy on Feb 5, 2011 12:49:57 GMT -4
No, but while I see why guys like Rough & Ready might get called jobbers, they had names in wrestling, did something in their careers. Jobbers are Rocky King, Steve Lombardi, etc. A set of all guys like that I doubt I'd get. No fair sticking some women in the set. An official FG set of jobbers is never going to happen. Same with an all-women set, I doubt even one of just 4, 6 or 8 cards even though I have plenty signed that one could be made. Just got one more new lady signed this week.
|
|
|
Post by maddog1981 on Feb 5, 2011 12:55:43 GMT -4
I wish they'd do a women's set. It's ridiculous that Martel and Martinez came out like six sets ago and we just now got 11 women in the game. It would be so easy to get a woman or two out a year and get us up to a respectable division.
|
|
|
Post by executioner on Feb 5, 2011 12:56:11 GMT -4
It would really depend on who was in it. I enjoy having jobbers added to LOW, but would still want a few "bigger names" to be added to the jobbers to make the set.
|
|
|
Post by tax on Feb 5, 2011 21:46:57 GMT -4
At least Tom seems willing to be adding a couple new women each time. I'd love some more undercarders, but probably not a full set. Maybe 3-4.
|
|
|
Post by lwffantrav on Feb 5, 2011 22:04:59 GMT -4
Are you kidding. I was a huge fan of George South and was pumped when he was announced. ONe of my all time fav matches is South vs Ric Flair
Get the Mulkeys, Rocky King, etc and hell yes
|
|
|
Post by jasonjaconetti on Feb 5, 2011 22:07:12 GMT -4
I would definately buy the set. I just don't think that we will ever see one
|
|
|
Post by todd on Feb 6, 2011 2:02:57 GMT -4
I'd buy it if it were midcard guys like Iron Mike Sharpe and The Duke Of Dorchester but probably wouldn't if it was a set of guys like Mr. X
|
|
|
Post by wildfire on Feb 6, 2011 10:40:40 GMT -4
I totally think they should do an all-womens set... even if it has to be direct to PDF. Women's wrestling is something some people really dig, and some don't. I'd much prefer the women being in their own set than being forced to get one or two (which you can't do anything with) in each set.
|
|
|
Post by holland227 on Feb 6, 2011 11:27:58 GMT -4
The Jobber set I think is something that would be wanted overall...however I feel the problem with the jobber status wrestler is they would want more money than some regular stars because they will think their time in wrestling is so valuable.
|
|
|
Post by Dustin on Feb 6, 2011 13:13:05 GMT -4
I honestly don't care if it's jobber or under/mid card. It just bothers me to have all of these main event guys in one fed sometimes. It's like, why is Magnum T.A. a curtain jerker? Well, I have too much top talent.
|
|
|
Post by maddog1981 on Feb 6, 2011 17:32:35 GMT -4
I honestly don't care if it's jobber or under/mid card. It just bothers me to have all of these main event guys in one fed sometimes. It's like, why is Magnum T.A. a curtain jerker? Well, I have too much top talent. That's why I don't understand why people get pissy about not having a top name in a set. I have more guys than I can use at the top of the fed. I always need mid and lower card guys to fill in the gaps.
|
|
|
Post by maddog1981 on Feb 6, 2011 17:34:53 GMT -4
I totally think they should do an all-womens set... even if it has to be direct to PDF. Women's wrestling is something some people really dig, and some don't. I'd much prefer the women being in their own set than being forced to get one or two (which you can't do anything with) in each set. That has been my problem. Martel and Martinez sat around doing nothing for years. I used Martel for the first time this year because there were finally enough women to have a division. That is ridiculous to me. Why release them if you weren't going to get enough women for a division any time soon.
|
|
|
Post by tax on Feb 6, 2011 22:55:49 GMT -4
I run four feds, so I never have to worry about having too many big names, I just spread them out. I'd buy a jobber set no problem, but I think Tom prefers them as LEs which makes sense too.
|
|