|
Post by Dustin on Feb 7, 2011 19:21:18 GMT -4
Does it matter to "them?"
|
|
|
Post by maddog1981 on Feb 7, 2011 19:23:33 GMT -4
Either way, if someone signs, they should get a card eventually.
|
|
|
Post by Dustin on Feb 7, 2011 19:31:04 GMT -4
Either way, if someone signs, they should get a card eventually. Agree.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2011 19:59:03 GMT -4
I'm still mad they didn't throw Giant Bernard in the last set anyways. They did it with Super Crazy, and he didn't win the poll. I'd rather have the Gianto Bernardo/Terry Gordy/Steve Williams dream team than Super Crazy.
|
|
|
Post by maddog1981 on Feb 7, 2011 20:03:33 GMT -4
Well, Super Crazy got put in because a bunch of promoters got butt hurt that their guy lost. They all whined about it while the Dundee voters tended to be quiet about the poll. Nevermind that it's a poll or anything like that. Dundee shouldn't have been a poll option though. He should've just been in the set.
|
|
|
Post by wildfire on Feb 8, 2011 9:37:03 GMT -4
My thing with Legends. There's no reason that we shouldn't get around 20 cards a year. There are tons of guys signed and some of them like Giant Bernard could be time sensitive. I would rather they rush out a Bernard SE/LE and actually get him than lose out on him. I don't see why they can't do a regular set in December and then give us 4 cards in July and maybe throw another release of 2-4 cards in somewhere else during the year. That would be OK. The 1st couple sets, they put out when they had guys to fill the set... it wasn't a schedule, when they had enough wrestlers for a set, they announced it, and started working on it. Why not stick with that? They could start work tomorrow on LoTF 4 and an all womens set and put them BOTH out at Galacticon... how cool would that be? Even if they're all lower-mid card guys that FG is concerned can't carry a set, make it a PDF. I feel very confident no legends set would ever lose money.
|
|