|
Post by lwffantrav on Dec 13, 2011 21:18:11 GMT -4
Non wrestling, while there will be an online wrestling one
|
|
|
Post by tax on Dec 13, 2011 22:18:55 GMT -4
now I consider the Hart card a total waste in the set.
|
|
|
Post by Peter F on Dec 13, 2011 23:35:07 GMT -4
I know he wrestled in Memphis, but I really have no plans to ever put him in the ring. I'm just fine with an interference chart or whatever's on the back. I mean, it's not blank, is it?
I still would have preferred interference for Cornette too, for that matter.
|
|
|
Post by wildfire on Dec 13, 2011 23:49:58 GMT -4
It COULD be blank.. manager cards in the old days were.
Hopefully he'll have some kinda chart or something... or he could still have wrestling stats... just more 'manager-y' ones than the online exclusive.
|
|
|
Post by MT on Dec 14, 2011 0:14:13 GMT -4
It COULD be blank.. manager cards in the old days were. Hopefully he'll have some kinda chart or something... or he could still have wrestling stats... just more 'manager-y' ones than the online exclusive. There hasn't been a blank back card in about a decade or so. Every card has SOMETHING on the back. There's no going back now, especially since the old "nameplate" is no longer on the front, which is where those ratings used to go on the managers.
|
|
|
Post by lwffantrav on Dec 14, 2011 7:07:25 GMT -4
Yeah, I'm doubting it'll be blank or I think people would be really pissed.
I still say a simple way to solve the manager card thing is to have wrestling stats on the card (if they apply) and have the manager interference chart in the booklet, like Tiger Mask's chart.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2011 7:32:53 GMT -4
All I'll say is the back is not blank...
|
|
|
Post by tax on Dec 14, 2011 9:26:55 GMT -4
It's not so much I care whether he had wrestling stats or not, but that they could have simply made him a LE/SE card and put an actual wrestler in the set.
|
|
|
Post by Chad Olson on Dec 14, 2011 10:27:51 GMT -4
Hart's LOW 11 card has an interference chart.
Tom considered Hart one of the "big names" for the set, so that's why he's not an LE.
|
|
|
Post by executioner on Dec 14, 2011 10:31:27 GMT -4
Hart's LOW 11 card has an interference chart. Tom considered Hart one of the "big names" for the set, so that's why he's not an LE. I agree with Tom on this one. Hart is a "big name".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2011 11:35:15 GMT -4
Hart's LOW 11 card has an interference chart. Tom considered Hart one of the "big names" for the set, so that's why he's not an LE. I agree with Tom on this one. Hart is a "big name". I agree too. I honestly think once every one gets their cards, they'll be more then happy with L11 and if not to each his own...
|
|
|
Post by Peter F on Dec 16, 2011 22:05:03 GMT -4
I really think the "interference chart for the card + wrestler stats online" is as close to a perfect solution as you can get. And the wrestler card is one of Werner's best, most accurate LOW drawings. I bring this up at this point because the wrestler card is really quite inventive and deserves major props. Two unique mechanics--the one-time-only "Add 1" move and the variable finisher rating based on how many of his goons are at ringside--add a lot to what could have been a throwaway jobber-type card. One thing I will bring up: if Jimmy Hart isn't a +5 Power, then who on earth is??!
|
|
|
Post by Boomslang on Dec 16, 2011 22:38:26 GMT -4
One thing I will bring up: if Jimmy Hart isn't a +5 Power, then who on earth is??! Well, I am, for one...
|
|